Bad Drama Angers Me

What is “bad drama”? Probably the most logical answer would be theatre that we hate, right? Drama, directing, acting and design that elicit a negative reaction, one of disgust or disappointment. And, in the moment, this can cause audiences to scoff or to roll their eyes, tell-tale signs that what they are watching is not good. But I don’t think this is entirely true. Perhaps, yes, the drama might be “bad” but aren’t those feelings, those full-body experiences of fury and scorn, theatre in itself?

I believe that dramatic, theatrical desires and emotion run through the veins of all of us. Any ideas that come from deep, repressed parts of our humanity is, in my eyes, what theatre is. And so, in that sense, the wide spectrum of reactions in response to “bad drama”, the ones that come from a buried recess in the body and psyche, can be called drama itself, allowing it to act as a reprise of the production that warrants such strong feelings. 


I find reading negative theatre reviews far more entertaining than positive ones. These kind of reviews have no expectations, no barriers. They don't worry about doing the play justice or selling it to mass audiences. Instead, they drench their words with passion, with betrayal, with frustration. That is where the real theatre lies. 


And it's not just the professionals. With bad drama, everyone suddenly becomes a theatre critic. They are analysing, evaluating and firing their opinions, no holds barred. The audience wake up and they scour through the performance with a fine tooth comb, searching for impurities to kick-start their tirade with. It alights something in them and secretly, the revel in the joy of deeming a production "trash" or "cheap" or "amateurish". 


Since its creation, the concept of theatre being unimpressive or detestable has circled around endless communities, quickly transferring to newspapers and now… blog posts. In fact, Aristotle himself engaged in theatre criticism, and I doubt that all of his “reviews” were glowing reverence. 


So, what is it that shapes our definition of “bad”? Naturally, we must look at what is good. Visually mesmerising, stirring theatre is entertainment that inspires, connects and unites those who love it. Unity. 


My argument is this: just as those who adore a piece of theatre are united in the moment of viewing it together, enjoying it together and remembering it together, those who are angered or let down by a performance are just as connected. They have the liberty of discussing, critiquing and making a judgement on the art they have witnessed and perhaps a more in-depth one at that. With this viewpoint, is bad drama really that bad?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Streetcar Named Desire by Tennessee Williams

Nudity, Sex, Suicide: A Review of 'Never Land' by Phyllis Nagy

The Degradation of Audience Etiquette